<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask the Expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs</link>
	<description>Portland Bolt's Frequently Asked Questions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Tie Rod Assembly Configurations</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/tie-rod-assembly-configurations</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/tie-rod-assembly-configurations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[astm tie rods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clevis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[turnbuckle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tie rods, clevises, and turnbuckles are an important part of many architectural designs. Canopy supports, structural steel bracing, and walkway hangers are a few of the applications that use these assemblies. The unique configuration allows for field adjustments in both length and tension.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:center;">
<img style="margin=auto;" src="../image/faq/Steel-Tie-Rod-Clevis-Turnbuckle.jpg" alt="Construction Tie Rod Assembly" />
</div>
<p class="box">How are tie rods, turnbuckles, and clevises configured?</p>
<p><a href="../products/rods/tie_rod.html">Tie rods</a>, <a href="../products/others/clevises.html">clevises</a>, and <a href="../products/others/turnbuckles.html">turnbuckles </a>are an important part of many architectural designs. Canopy supports, structural steel bracing, and walkway hangers are a few of the applications that use these assemblies. The unique configuration allows for field adjustments in both length and tension.</p>
<p><strong>Adjustment</strong><br />
Adjustments are possible by threading opposing ends of the rod right hand (RH) and left hand (LH). Another alternative is to provide two clevises threaded RH and use a turnbuckle in the middle that has RH and LH threads. The assembly length and tension is adjusted by rotating the turnbuckle. Both options allow the assembly to be installed and easily adjusted in place.</p>
<p><img style="float:left;" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/clevis-grip.jpg" alt="Clevis Grip" /><strong>Grip</strong><br />
The grip on a clevis refers the distance between the legs. This is the area that will be placed over the plate and held by a pin. Generally, the grip size is calculated by the material thickness plus ¼”. Keep in mind the minimum grip is ¾” for #2 through #5 clevises and 1” for #6 and #7.<br />
<br/><br/><br />
<img style="float:right;" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/clevis-pin.jpg" alt="Clevis Pin" /><strong>Pin</strong><br />
Clevis pins are available headed or smooth and are generally secured with a cotter pin connection. In some applications an ASTM A325 structural bolt can also be used to connect the clevis to the structure. Refer to the <a href="../products/others/clevises.html">Diameter of Pin in Inches</a> chart on the clevis page for the appropriate pin dimensions. This chart is designed so that the pin will surpass the matching rod strength.</p>
<p><strong>Galvanizing</strong><br />
Hot-dip galvanized clevises and turnbuckles are available. It is crucial for correct fit that the clevises and turnbuckles are tapped oversize to account for the additional thickness from zinc on the tie rods. To ensure the proper fit Portland Bolt assembles all parts prior to shipping.</p>
<p><strong>Common Layouts</strong><br />
<em>Tie Rod with Two Clevises and a Turnbuckle</em><br />
<img src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/Tie_Rod1.jpg" alt="Steel Tie Rod with Clevises and Turnbuckle" /></p>
<p><em>Tie Rod with Two Clevises Only</em><br />
<img src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/Tie_Rod2.jpg" alt="Steel Tie Rod with Clevises" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/tie-rod-assembly-configurations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of ASTM A325 and A449</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/comparison-of-astm-a325-and-a449</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/comparison-of-astm-a325-and-a449#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindsay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ASTM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These bolts are identical with regard to strength and chemistry. There are very minor differences in the hardness requirements, but the proof load, tensile, and yield strength requirements are the same.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="box">I have two items that use 1&#8243; bolts, one is ASTM A325 and the other is ASTM A449, I would like to just use one.  Which is the one that meets or exceeds the other?</p>
<p>These bolts are identical with regard to strength and chemistry. There are very minor differences in the hardness requirements, but the proof load, tensile, and yield strength requirements are the same. From a manufacturing standpoint, we make these bolts using the same raw material and the same heat treating and production methods. Our <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/fastener_identification_markings.html">strength by grade chart</a> gives a detailed comparison.</p>
<p>The difference between these two specifications (<a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A325.html">A325 </a>and <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A449.html">A449</a>) is the diameter range, configuration, and application. A325 bolts are heavy hex head bolts ONLY, and are designed for structural steel connections. They range in diameter from ½” – 1-1/2” inclusive. Due to their application, an A325 <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/products/bolts/structural_bolts.html">structural bolt</a> has a shorter thread length than a typical<a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/products/bolts/heavy_hex_bolts.html"> heavy hex bolt</a>. If you need a bolt with longer threads, ASTM A449 should be used.</p>
<p>ASTM A449 bolts range in diameter from ¼” – 3” inclusive and are far more flexible in their configuration. In other words, A449 bolts can be a headed bolt, a straight rod with threads, or a bend bolt such as a right angle bend foundation bolt.</p>
<p>With regard to availability, A325 bolts are mass produced and far more common in the marketplace than A449 bolts. Therefore, A325 bolts would be immediately available and considerably less expensive than A449 bolts, unless the bolts you are dealing with are exceedingly long in length. Since the thread length on A325 bolts is very short you should make sure they will be adequate for your application. ASTM suggests using A449 in lieu of A325 when a nonstandard thread length is needed. Here is an excerpt from the A325 specification:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>This specification is applicable to heavy hex structural bolts only. For bolts of other configurations and thread lengths with similar mechanical properties, see Specification A 449.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>For example, a 1” diameter A325 bolt that exists in the marketplace will have 1-3/4” of thread. There is a supplemental requirement in the A325 specification for fully threaded A325-T bolts that are 4 X diameter in length or shorter. There are often 1” diameter fully threaded A325’s that are readily available but they are no longer than 4” in length.</p>
<p>Portland Bolt’s position regarding ASTM specifications are that they are simply guidelines. They provide a buyer with a reasonable expectation as to the product they will receive if they order it to an ASTM specification. However, if the buyer and seller agree to change any portions of the specification, that is acceptable as long as the change is clear and agreed upon by both parties. Therefore, we frequently manufacture A325 bolts with longer thread lengths than “standard”. Since 1” diameter A325 bolts wouldn’t exist “on the shelf” with that nonstandard thread length anyhow (2-3/8”), it would make more sense to spec the bolt to A449 since it would be the proper spec to use and the bolts would need to be manufactured special regardless of which specification you choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/comparison-of-astm-a325-and-a449/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concerns Calculating Torque</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/concerns-calculating-torque</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/concerns-calculating-torque#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Torque is a difficult value to calculate accurately, especially for construction fasteners and should be used cautiously.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torque is a difficult value to calculate accurately, especially for construction fasteners and should be <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/tension-vs-torque-explained-sort-of">used cautiously</a>. The primary challenge is accounting for environmental factors, coatings, and a number of other variables including surface texture, material hardness, and thread series. In most situations, it is challenging to give reliable allowable torque values for bolted assemblies. For the most accurate data we recommend <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rotational-capacity-testing">field testing</a> the intended assemblies using a calibrated torque wrench and a Skidmore-Wilhelm load indicating device to equate actual torque to the desired tension. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/bolt-torque-chart.html">theoretical torque values</a> listed on our site are intended as reference point. This chart only covers products with a published friction coefficient. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/concerns-calculating-torque/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hex Bolts vs. Hex Cap Screws</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/hex-bolts-vs-hex-cap-screws</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/hex-bolts-vs-hex-cap-screws#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bolt Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The differences between a hex cap screw and hex bolt are fairly significant, both from a manufacturing perspective and application standpoint.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="box">What are the differences between a hex cap screw and a hex bolt?</p>
<p>These terms are often incorrectly used interchangeably. The variations between these fasteners are fairly significant both from a manufacturing perspective and application standpoint. Generally speaking, hex cap screws are used in precise applications like an <abbr title="Original Equipment Manufacturer">OEM</abbr> setting where tight tolerances are required. A hex bolt is often specified when the mechanical properties are more important than dimensional tolerances, like the construction industry. For example, SAE J429 Grade 2 is typically provided as a hex cap screw, whereas ASTM A307-A is a common hex bolt specification.</p>
<p>Below is an overview of some of the specifics these fasteners are required to meet.</p>
<p><strong>Hex cap screws</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Flat washer facing under the head that meet specific tolerances as described under <abbr title="American Society Of Mechanical Engineers">ASME</abbr> B18.2.1-1996.</li>
<li>They will usually be manufactured by a cold-heading process (large runs of standard sizes) or turned <abbr title="Computer Numerical Control">CNC</abbr> operation.</li>
<li>A radius under the head at the shank.</li>
<li>Body diameter of plus nothing, minus .011&#8243; for an 1-1/4&#8243; diameter fastener.</li>
<li>Some common fastener specifications unless otherwise specified: ASTM <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A449.html">A449</a> and SAE J429 Grade 2, 5, and 8.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/products/bolts/hex_bolts.html">Hex bolts</a></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A die seam across the bearing surface is permissible.</li>
<li>The typical bolt is manufactured by hot-forging process.</li>
<li>Allows a reduced body diameter to be not less than the minimum pitch diameter of the thread.</li>
<li>Some common fastener specifications unless otherwise specified: ASTM <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A307.html">A307-A</a>, <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A354.html">A354</a>, and <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_F1554.html">F1554</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>This list is not inclusive, but represents some of the differences between these two designations. There is flexibility to use other materials, grades, and bolt standards as agreed by manufacturer and purchaser. So, be cautious when <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/how-to-order-bolts">ordering bolts</a> that you make sure to be clear what type your project requires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/hex-bolts-vs-hex-cap-screws/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lag Screw Shear Strength and Design</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/lag-screw-shear-strength-and-design</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/lag-screw-shear-strength-and-design#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindsay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, “standard” lag screws that are readily available in the marketplace are ungraded, meaning they are not manufactured to any ASTM specification and have no mechanical properties.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="box"><strong>Question:</strong> How do I determine the shear capacity and strength of lag screws?</div>
<p><img style="border: 1px solid rgb(170, 170, 170); float: right;" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/products/prev/lag_screw3.jpg" alt="Hex Lag Screw" /><strong>Answer:</strong> Unfortunately, we have no specific data to answer this question. First, “standard” lag screws that are readily available in the marketplace are ungraded, meaning they are not manufactured to any ASTM specification and have no mechanical requirements. Therefore, it is impossible to determine the strength characteristics of a lag screw unless they are custom manufactured or the specific lot of bolts is tested. Second, the forces that are acting on these lag screws will affect their ability to hold the structure in place. The <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/bolt-shear-strength-considerations">shear strength of a fastener</a> is approximately 60% of its tensile strength, but this is only an approximation and unless you have graded lag screws, there is no way to determine shear or tensile strengths. Additionally, the type of wood, grain structure, etc. will determine the ability for a lag screw to withstand the forces that are acting against it. Finally, we have no engineers on staff and due to liability issues; we are not in a position to answer these types of questions.  We would recommend contacting a structural engineer.</p>
<p>The <a class="external" target="_blank" href="http://www.awc.org/HelpOutreach/faq/FAQfiles/Lag_Screws.html">American Wood Council</a> has more information regarding wood construction and specific lag bolt recommendations. They also have an extensive <a class="external" target="_target" href="http://www.awc.org/calculators/connections/ccstyle.asp">wood connection calculator</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/lag-screw-shear-strength-and-design/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grade 55 Steel Properties</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/grade-55-steel-properties</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/grade-55-steel-properties#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindsay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ASTM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with ASTM A108, 1018CF is that there are no mechanical requirements and typically the test reports that accompany this steel reflect the chemistry only and not the strength of the steel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="box">We have been asked to supply <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_F1554.html">ASTM F1554 Grade 55</a> anchor bolts on a site we are working on and one of our suppliers supplied ASTM A108 Round Bar, a CF-1018 Round Bar as a substitute for these F1554 Grade. Will this material work based on the ASTM F1554 criteria?</div>
<p><img style="float:right; padding-top:10px; padding-right:10px;" src="../../image/faq/steel-rack.jpg" alt="Steel Racks" /><br />
The problem with ASTM A108, 1018CF is that there are <strong>no mechanical requirements</strong> and typically the test reports that accompany this steel reflect the chemistry only and not the strength of the steel. Test reports will need to accompany this material that reflect all four of the values listed below, and these values will need to meet the requirements of the F1554 grade 55 specification. If the test reports do not reflect any or all of the required mechanical properties, a sample of the same heat of material will need to be tested by a laboratory to determine if the 1018 material meets all of the criteria.</p>
<p>ASTM F1554 grade 55 has the following mechanical requirements for diameters ¼” – 2”:</p>
<ul>
<li>Minimum Yield: 55,000 psi</li>
<li>Tensile Strength: 75,000 psi – 95,000 psi</li>
<li>Minimum Elongation: 21%</li>
<li>Minimum Reduction of Area: 30%</li>
</ul>
<p>We have found two resources that give theoretical values one could expect 1018 cold finished steel to meet but they are very different. The steel warehouse sources and theoretical values are listed below:</p>
<table style="margin: auto; text-align: center;" border="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Steel Supplier</th>
<th>Yield, min, ksi</th>
<th>Tensile, ksi</th>
<th>Elong %, min</th>
<th>Reduction<br />
of Area</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Earl M Jorgensen</td>
<td style="color:#0C0;">70</td>
<td style="color:#0C0;">85</td>
<td style="color:#0C0;">28%</td>
<td style="color:#0C0;">55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pacific Machine and Tool Steel</td>
<td style="color:#F00;">54</td>
<td style="color:#F00;">64</td>
<td style="color:#F00;">15%</td>
<td style="color:#F00;">Not Reported</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="padding-top:10px;">Based on theoretical values reported by Earl M Jorgensen, in theory 1018 CF <strong>should meet</strong> the requirements of F1554 grade 55, while the theoretical values reported by Pacific Machine and Tool Steel indicate that 1018 CF <strong>will not meet the mechanical requirements</strong> of F1554 grade 55. The only way to know with 100% certainty is to have the specific heat of steel tested for Yield Strength, Tensile Strength, Elongation, and Reduction of Area.</p>
<p>Our steel inventory includes material certified to meet all the requirements of grade 55. Most of this steel is supplied directly from North American steel mills and rolled specifically to meet the ASTM specifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/grade-55-steel-properties/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malleable Iron Washer Details</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/malleable-iron-washer-details</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/malleable-iron-washer-details#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bolt Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For many years a malleable iron washer has been a common component in heavy timber and marine construction. With a large bearing surface and thick cast design they help prevent the bolt head or nut from pulling through wood connections.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="box"><strong>Question:</strong> What are the purposes for the different components in malleable iron washers (MIW)?</div>
<p>For many years a <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/products/washers/malleable_iron_washer.html">malleable iron washer</a> has been a common component in heavy timber and marine construction. With a large bearing surface and thick cast design they help prevent the bolt head or nut from pulling through wood connections.</p>
<p>There are two common types of <abbr title="Malleable Iron Washer">MIW</abbr>. One style of malleable washer is produced in the United States, while the other is made overseas. The import option is readily available in the marketplace in sizes for bolts from 3/8&#8243; to 1&#8243; in diameter. It has one nail hole and two notches on the outer edge. The domestic washer is similar with two vertical slots on the outside edge, but is missing a nail hole. Both have similar inside and outside dimensions.</p>
<div style="margin: 10px 5px 10px 10px; float: left;">
<img style="float: left;" alt="Malleable Iron Washer - Import" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/Malleable-Iron-Washer-Import.jpg"/></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Import <abbr title="Malleable Iron Washer">MIW</abbr></strong></p>
</div>
<div style="margin: 10px 5px 10px 10px; float: right;">
<img alt="Malleable Iron Washer - Domestic" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/malleable-washer-domestic.jpg"/>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Domestic <abbr title="Malleable Iron Washer">MIW</abbr></strong></p>
</div>
<p>According to the <a class="external" target="_blank" href="http://books.google.com/patents?pg=PA9&#038;id=edJWAAAAEBAJ&#038;output=html">original patent from 1907</a> the outer notches were meant to lock the washer from turning against the wood. A chisel is used to bend the metal edge into the wood. To our knowledge, this installation process is rarely used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/malleable-iron-washer-details/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rotational Capacity Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rotational-capacity-testing</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rotational-capacity-testing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[astm 325]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nut rotational testing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rocap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Per ASTM A325 section 6.3.1, the rotational capacity test is defined as a test, "that is intended to evaluate the presence of a lubricant, the efficiency of the lubricant, and the compatibility of assemblies as represented by the components selected for testing." ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OVERVIEW</strong></p>
<p>Per ASTM A325 section 6.3.1, the rotational capacity test is defined as a test, &#8220;that is intended to evaluate the presence of a lubricant, the efficiency of the lubricant, and the compatibility of assemblies as represented by the components selected for testing.&#8221; In a 1970 study referenced by the Research Council on Structural Connections (RCSC), it was shown that galvanizing increases the friction between the bolt and nut threads as well as the variability of the torque-induced pretension. A lower required torque value and more consistent results are obtained when lubricated nuts are used as part of the bolt assembly. Rotational capacity testing must show that the galvanized lubricated nut may be rotated from the snug tight condition well in excess of the rotation required for pretensioned installation without stripping. In layman&#8217;s terms, the test is required to show that the nut will not gall on the bolt and that the assembly will develop the pretension load desired. </p>
<p>Since, this test requires that each material lot of bolt and nut be tested individually, contractors will typically administer this test on the job site. However, upon request Portland Bolt can perform this test in our facility prior to shipping.<br />
<center><br />
<embed id="VideoPlayback" style="width:400px;height:300px" flashvars="" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=4846582094207043410&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> </embed></p>
<p><em>This video is a quick example of a few steps required when performing a ROCAP test.</em></p>
<p></center><br />
<strong>PROCEDURE</strong></p>
<p>1. Standard A325 Rotational Capacity Procedure</p>
<p>The bolt, nut, washer assembly shall be assembled in to a steel joint so that 3-5 threads are located between the bearing surfaces of the bolt head and nut. The assembly shall be tightened to no less than 10% of the specified proof load. After initial tightening, the nut position shall be marked relative to the bolt and the specified rotation shall be applied. The specified rotation shall be as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>2/3 rotation (240deg), for bolt lengths that are 4 times the diameter or less.</li>
<li>1 rotation (360deg), for bolt lengths that are over 4 times diameter but no more than 8x.</li>
<li>1-1/6 rotation (420deg), for bolt lengths that are greater than 8 times diameter.</li>
<li>For lengths over 12 times the diameter, the test is not applicable.</li>
</ul>
<p>After the tightening rotation has been applied, the assembly shall be taken apart and examined for compliance. The assembly fails to pass if any of the following occur:</p>
<ul>
<li>Inability to install the assembly to the nut rotation specified.</li>
<li>Inability to remove the nut after installing the the specified rotation</li>
<li>Shear failure of the threads as determined by visual examination following removal.</li>
<li>Torsional or tension failure of the bolt. Elongation of the bolt, between the nut and bolt head is to be expected and should not be classified as a failure.</li>
</ul>
<p>2. Department of Transportation (DOT)/<abbr title="American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials">AASHTO</abbr> Rotational Capacity Procedure</p>
<div>This Rotational Capacity Test follows the same general procedures as the standard test, but with a few more measurements and details.  The bolt assembly is tightened to a specified initial tension (example: 3/4&#8243; = 3kips) and the nut position is marked relative to the bolt head.  The assembly is then tightened to a minimum specified tension (3/4&#8243; = 28kips) and the torque is measured.  The recorded torque value must not exceed the stated maximum (3/4&#8243;= 438ft-lbs).  The assembly is then tightened further, to the following rotation:</div>
<ul>
<li>2/3 rotation (240deg), for bolt lengths that are 4 times the diameter or less.</li>
<li>1 rotation (360deg), for bolt lengths that are over 4 times diameter but no more than 8x.</li>
<li>1-1/6 rotation (420deg), for bolt lengths that are greater than 8 times diameter.</li>
</ul>
<div>The tension after this final tightening is recorded, and must not exceed 1.15x the minimum installation tension above (3/4&#8243;=32kips). </div>
<div>
<p>After the tightening rotation has been applied, the assembly shall be taken apart and examined for compliance. The assembly fails to pass if any of the following occur:</p>
<ul>
<li>Exceeding the maximum allowable torque in the torque/tension comparison.</li>
<li>Failure to achieve the required rotation.</li>
<li>Failure to achieve the required tension at the required rotation.</li>
<li>Thread failure. The nut shall turn, with your fingers, on the bolt threads to the position it was in during the test.  If you cannot turn the nut with your fingers it is considered thread failure.</li>
<li>Torsional or tension failure of the bolt. Elongation of the bolt, between the nut and bolt head is to be expected and should not be classified as a failure.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div><strong>Rotational Capacity Test Examples</strong></div>
<ol>
<li>Bridge Rotational Capacity</li>
<li>Standard</li>
<li>Federal Highway Administration</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Referencing Specifications</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a class="external" href="https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/rotational.htm" target="_blank">Procedures for Performing Rotational Capacity Test</a> - United States Department of Transportation</li>
<li>ASTM A325 10.2 - Testing</li>
<li>ASTM Work Item WK15535 Test Methods for Rotational Capacity Testing of Plain or Coated Bolt, Nut and Washer Assemblies</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rotational-capacity-testing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steel Prices up 17 Percent</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/steel-prices-up-17-percent</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/steel-prices-up-17-percent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bolt Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since steel is the primary raw material used to manufacture our products we closely monitor price changes in the market. To date we have seen slight, periodic increases in the cost of steel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/wp-content/steel-stack.jpg'><img src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/wp-content/steel-stack.jpg" alt="Raw Steel " title="steel-stack" width="100" height="100" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-59" /></a>Since steel is the primary raw material used to manufacture our products we closely monitor price changes in the market. To date we have seen slight, periodic increases in the cost of steel. However, steel producing mills have recently announced larger increases of approximately 17% that will take effect over the next couple weeks. The main factors for this dramatic increase are the rising costs of scrap metal and ore, primarily due to the escalating demand in the Asian markets. As global demand for steel grows we expect this trend to continue. You can expect to see an impact on the prices of all steel related products in the second quarter of 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/steel-prices-up-17-percent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grade C Eliminated From ASTM A307</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/grade-c-eliminated-from-astm-a307</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/grade-c-eliminated-from-astm-a307#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindsay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ASTM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/grade-c-elimated-from-astm-a307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One recent change with regard to specifications that will have a significant impact on the construction fastener industry is the 2007 elimination of the grade C designation within the ASTM A307 specification.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One change with regard to specifications that will have a significant impact on the construction fastener industry is the August 2007 elimination of the grade C designation within the <a href="/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A307.html">ASTM A307 specification</a>. ASTM A307 is the standard specification for low carbon steel construction fasteners. Until recently, A307 had three grades A, B, and C. Grade A covers bolts for general applications, grade B covers heavy hex bolts and studs for cast iron flanges, while grade C covered unheaded anchor bolts, either bent or straight, intended for structural anchorage purposes. Last year’s elimination of A307 grade C is the result of a virtually identical specification, F1554 grade 36 developed in 1994, replacing it. </p>
<p>Although A307 grade C and F1554 grade 36 are virtually identical, there are some subtle yet very important differences.  The ASTM F1554 specification was introduced in 1994 and covers anchor bolts designed to anchor structural supports to concrete foundations. F1554 grade 36 is manufactured from low carbon steel just like ASTM A307 grade C was but in addition to being a bent or straight anchor bolt, can also be a headed bolt that is embedded in concrete and used for anchoring purposes. Most commercially available all thread rod that meets ASTM A307 and is used for <a href="/faqs/f1554-grade-36-all-thread-rod.">anchor bolts will not meet ASTM F1554 grade 36</a>. Additionally, imported A307 hex bolts that are commonly embedded in concrete and used as anchor bolts will not meet F1554 grade 36. However, many fastener distributors and even some manufacturers who do not have a thorough understanding of the differences between ASTM A307 grade C and F1554 grade 36 continue to provide A307 bolts believing they will cross-certify to ASTM F1554 grade 36 which is simply not the case in most instances. It is important to be aware of the differences between these two specifications to limit exposure to unnecessary liability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/grade-c-eliminated-from-astm-a307/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
